keyboard | Laves’ handwriting |
r (glide) | printed lc "r" |
rr (flap) | script lc "r", ![]() |
u | small uc "u" |
e | lc epsilon |
v | shwa symbol, ![]() |
: (length) | . single raised postcript dot |
dj | dj |
ny | nj |
ng | engma, ![]() |
th | subscripted (dental) "t" |
dh | subscripted (dental) "d" |
d2 | "d" with a line through the loop |
nggy | nggj, as in Athima wuinggjinba ‘red kangaroo’, poss. /nyg/ |
Phonetics are not tooLaves made a further note after meeting Norman B Tindale:
badalthough the distinction
I object to ( r = r
( rr =?
= ng
Phonetic discussion with
Professor Ross-Herbert?
& Mr. Tyndale
Prof. is classically trained
& also interested in Provence
phonetics. Pretty bad
dj as in judge _ † !
needs wholesale remodelling.
Leaving a copy of my
phonetic schema with
them and have discussed
phonetics at length with
Tyndale. Curious how
G.L. should speak so
authoritatively! vielleicht
ein wenig zu fest aufgetreten*
but no use in wasting
time on endless arguments
à la standard gauge.
? a lower-case script r; these pair of r's are in Tindale's chartLaves notebook 2.27
"25 February 1931 - / Albany / Adelaide / Sydney"
Cf. NB Tindale note on Laves
Laves page
URL: http://www.anu.edu.au/linguistics/nash/aust/laves/phonetics.html